Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /home1/rocketb1/public_html/archive/textpattern/lib/constants.php on line 136
Rocket Bomber

Rocket Bomber

Manga 500 Rankings: 2010, week 26

filed under , 19 July 2010, 01:24 by

last week’s rankings

The Weekly Charts:
Your Executive Summary and Index
Week ending 27 June 2010

Internet Archive link: http://www.archive.org/details/MangaRankingsWeekEnding27June2010

Manga Top 500

1. ↔0 (1) : Naruto 48 – Viz Shonen Jump, Jun 2010 [449.3] ::
2. ↔0 (2) : Vampire Knight 10 – Viz Shojo Beat, Jun 2010 [421.2] ::
3. ↑3 (6) : Naruto 47 – Viz Shonen Jump, Feb 2010 [417.5] ::
4. ↓-1 (3) : Hellsing 10 – Dark Horse, Jun 2010 [391.9] ::
5. ↓-1 (4) : Negima! 26 – Del Rey, May 2010 [372.6] ::
6. ↓-1 (5) : Maximum Ride 1 – Yen Press, Jan 2009 [356.7] ::
7. ↑1 (8) : Maximum Ride 2 – Yen Press, Oct 2009 [330.6] ::
8. ↓-1 (7) : Vampire Knight 9 – Viz Shojo Beat, Feb 2010 [316.7] ::
9. ↔0 (9) : Bleach 31 – Viz Shonen Jump, Jun 2010 [297.4] ::
10. ↑1 (11) : Black Butler 2 – Yen Press, May 2010 [261.6] ::

[more]

Top Imprints
Number of titles ranking in the Manga 500:

Viz Shonen Jump 93
Tokyopop 65
Yen Press 44
Viz Shojo Beat 39
Dark Horse 32
Viz 31
Viz Shonen Jump Advanced 30
Del Rey 26
Vizkids 26
HC/Tokyopop 15

[more]

Top 50 Series:

1. ↔0 (1) : Naruto – Viz Shonen Jump [1,120.4] ::
2. ↔0 (2) : Vampire Knight – Viz Shojo Beat [883.9] ::
3. ↔0 (3) : Maximum Ride – Yen Press [695.4] ::
4. ↔0 (4) : One Piece – Viz Shonen Jump [568.9] ::
5. ↔0 (5) : Bleach – Viz Shonen Jump [548.7] ::
6. ↔0 (6) : Warriors – HC/Tokyopop [520.0] ::
7. ↑1 (8) : Negima! – Del Rey [477.0] ::
8. ↑2 (10) : Black Butler – Yen Press [475.8] ::
9. ↓-2 (7) : Alice in the Country of Hearts – Tokyopop [468.8] ::
10. ↑3 (13) : Soul Eater – Yen Press [448.2] ::

[more]

Top 50 New Releases:
(Titles releasing/released This Month & Last)

1. ↔0 (1) : Naruto 48 – Viz Shonen Jump, Jun 2010 [449.3] ::
2. ↔0 (2) : Vampire Knight 10 – Viz Shojo Beat, Jun 2010 [421.2] ::
4. ↓-1 (3) : Hellsing 10 – Dark Horse, Jun 2010 [391.9] ::
5. ↓-1 (4) : Negima! 26 – Del Rey, May 2010 [372.6] ::
9. ↔0 (9) : Bleach 31 – Viz Shonen Jump, Jun 2010 [297.4] ::
10. ↑1 (11) : Black Butler 2 – Yen Press, May 2010 [261.6] ::
12. ↑7 (19) : Spice & Wolf (novel) 2 – Yen Press, Jun 2010 [250.5] ::
13. ↑5 (18) : Soul Eater 3 – Yen Press, Jun 2010 [249.4] ::
14. ↓-2 (12) : Battle Angel Alita Last Order 13 – Viz, Jun 2010 [248.1] ::
17. ↓-4 (13) : Claymore 16 – Viz Shonen Jump Advanced, Jun 2010 [224.6] ::

[more]

Top 50 Preorders:

58. ↑38 (96) : Haruhi Suzumiya The Boredom of Haruhi Suzumiya (novel) – Little, Brown & Co., Jul 2010 [145.9] ::
75. ↑7 (82) : Warriors Ravenpaw’s Path 3 – HC/Tokyopop, Aug 2010 [133.0] ::
139. ↓-2 (137) : Naruto 49 – Viz Shonen Jump, Oct 2010 [86.1] ::
152. ↓-11 (141) : Maximum Ride 3 – Yen Press, Aug 2010 [81.8] ::
154. ↑33 (187) : Pokemon Diamond & Pearl Adventures 7 – Vizkids, Jul 2010 [80.7] ::
161. ↑91 (252) : Negima! 27 – Del Rey, Jul 2010 [77.8] ::
178. ↑31 (209) : Yotsuba&! 9 – Yen Press, Dec 2010 [69.8] ::
187. ↑164 (351) : Return to Labyrinth 4 – Tokyopop, Aug 2010 [67.2] ::
202. ↑23 (225) : Spice & Wolf (manga) 3 – Yen Press, Nov 2010 [63.8] ::
203. ↑252 (455) : Tsubasa: Reservoir Chronicle 27 – Del Rey, Jul 2010 [63.3] ::

[more]



Manga 500 Rankings: 2010, Week 25

filed under , 19 July 2010, 01:03 by

The Weekly Charts:
Your Executive Summary and Index
Week ending 20 June 2010

Internet Archive link: http://www.archive.org/details/MangaRankingsWeekEnding20June2010

Manga Top 500

1. ↔0 (1) : Naruto 48 – Viz Shonen Jump, Jun 2010 [459.7] ::
2. ↔0 (2) : Vampire Knight 10 – Viz Shojo Beat, Jun 2010 [428.1] ::
3. ↔0 (3) : Hellsing 10 – Dark Horse, Jun 2010 [405.8] ::
4. ↔0 (4) : Negima! 26 – Del Rey, May 2010 [384.7] ::
5. ↔0 (5) : Maximum Ride 1 – Yen Press, Jan 2009 [360.8] ::
6. ↔0 (6) : Naruto 47 – Viz Shonen Jump, Feb 2010 [354.9] ::
7. ↔0 (7) : Vampire Knight 9 – Viz Shojo Beat, Feb 2010 [325.2] ::
8. ↔0 (8) : Maximum Ride 2 – Yen Press, Oct 2009 [320.0] ::
9. ↔0 (9) : Bleach 31 – Viz Shonen Jump, Jun 2010 [300.6] ::
10. ↔0 (10) : Vampire Knight 8 – Viz Shojo Beat, Nov 2009 [268.1] ::

[more]

Top Imprints
Number of titles ranking in the Manga 500:

Viz Shonen Jump 106
Tokyopop 59
Yen Press 47
Viz Shojo Beat 43
Viz 32
Viz Shonen Jump Advanced 31
Del Rey 26
Vizkids 25
Dark Horse 17
Viz Signature 16

[more]

Top 50 Series:

1. ↔0 (1) : Naruto – Viz Shonen Jump [1,063.0] ::
2. ↔0 (2) : Vampire Knight – Viz Shojo Beat [902.2] ::
3. ↔0 (3) : Maximum Ride – Yen Press [689.3] ::
4. ↔0 (4) : One Piece – Viz Shonen Jump [607.9] ::
5. ↔0 (5) : Bleach – Viz Shonen Jump [560.9] ::
6. ↔0 (6) : Warriors – HC/Tokyopop [529.3] ::
7. ↑13 (20) : Alice in the Country of Hearts – Tokyopop [487.1] ::
8. ↓-1 (7) : Negima! – Del Rey [474.5] ::
9. ↓-1 (8) : Black Bird – Viz Shojo Beat [471.6] ::
10. ↓-1 (9) : Black Butler – Yen Press [457.0] ::

[more]

Top 50 New Releases:
(Titles releasing/released This Month & Last)

1. ↔0 (1) : Naruto 48 – Viz Shonen Jump, Jun 2010 [459.7] ::
2. ↔0 (2) : Vampire Knight 10 – Viz Shojo Beat, Jun 2010 [428.1] ::
3. ↔0 (3) : Hellsing 10 – Dark Horse, Jun 2010 [405.8] ::
4. ↔0 (4) : Negima! 26 – Del Rey, May 2010 [384.7] ::
9. ↔0 (9) : Bleach 31 – Viz Shonen Jump, Jun 2010 [300.6] ::
11. ↑1 (12) : Black Butler 2 – Yen Press, May 2010 [262.8] ::
12. ↓-1 (11) : Battle Angel Alita Last Order 13 – Viz, Jun 2010 [250.1] ::
13. ↔0 (13) : Claymore 16 – Viz Shonen Jump Advanced, Jun 2010 [248.5] ::
17. ↑1 (18) : Alice in the Country of Hearts 3 – Tokyopop, Jun 2010 [236.1] ::
18. ↓-4 (14) : Soul Eater 3 – Yen Press, Jun 2010 [235.8] ::

[more]

Top 50 Preorders:

82. ↑12 (94) : Warriors Ravenpaw’s Path 3 – HC/Tokyopop, Aug 2010 [119.3] ::
96. ↑1 (97) : Haruhi Suzumiya The Boredom of Haruhi Suzumiya (novel) – Little, Brown & Co., Jul 2010 [109.8] ::
137. ↑8 (145) : Naruto 49 – Viz Shonen Jump, Oct 2010 [86.9] ::
141. ↑19 (160) : Maximum Ride 3 – Yen Press, Aug 2010 [85.9] ::
187. ↑9 (196) : Pokemon Diamond & Pearl Adventures 7 – Vizkids, Jul 2010 [69.9] ::
209. ↑10 (219) : Yotsuba&! 9 – Yen Press, Dec 2010 [60.4] ::
211. ↑31 (242) : Berserk 34 – Dark Horse, Sep 2010 [60.3] ::
225. ↑3 (228) : Spice & Wolf (manga) 3 – Yen Press, Nov 2010 [58.4] ::
252. ↓-1 (251) : Negima! 27 – Del Rey, Jul 2010 [52.5] ::
255. ↑6 (261) : Spice & Wolf (manga) 2 – Yen Press, Jul 2010 [52.0] ::

[more]



A Manga Database. For you to Use, Reuse, Remix, and Enjoy.

filed under , 6 July 2010, 12:07 by

[Fanfare!]

Introducing the Manga Database, a listing of thousands of manga volumes in hundreds of manga series, all lined up and ready to be sorted in at least 4 ways!

[/fanfare]

##

• So, What is it?

It’s a spreadsheet. Basically a big honking list of manga by title, with publishing info (publisher & month/year of release) and separate columns for each field.

Just so you know: 1890+ series listed (which includes a whole lot of one-volume “series”) and a total of 8,738 individual manga volumes. In one list. (Actually, in a sortable spreadsheet.)

• And, uh… well, what’s it for?

It began as one of the core parts of my manga rankings spreadsheet, something I’ve been adding onto week by week since July of 2007. With appropriate data collection methods, one could use it to track and post aggregate online comparative sales across 9 or 10 book selling sites and then post charts with overall bestsellers, best-selling new releases, top pre-ordered titles, things like that. In fact, that’s exactly what it’s good for.

I’m making the data available to everyone because, well, there may be some other good use for it.

• Ah, the sales pitch; how much you charging for it?

Be free, little data, go frolic and prosper. I’m releasing all files as posted below (skip to the end) under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license — so go ahead, have it. Post it to your own site [with proper attribution], augment your own wiki or index with the data, remix it, find new uses for it (if there are any).

• Is it authoritative, comprehensive, & complete?

Hell, no. Some books (Yen Press’s Twilight, Del Rey’s Odd Thomas series, Oni Press’s Scott Pilgrim) have been excluded even though quite a few of my sources lump them in with manga. Other English-language original manga is included though, including almost all of the Harpercollins/Tokyopop collaborative titles and quite a bit of Del Rey’s non-manga graphic novels that are meant to look like manga and pitched at the same market.

I could have done a complete graphic novel list, but chose not to. The boundary lines that delineate manga from the rest are blurry (and missing) and everyone has their own criteria for what is or is not manga. I used my own judgement.

Also, a number of titles are out of print and/or so obscure they never made it into my sources, so I never saw them (and didn’t go out of my way to add them).

• What are the criteria for inclusion?

Licensed manga, manhwa, and those few manhua that have been licensed and translated into English are obviously in. Most output from major manga publishers (Dark Horse, DMP, Del Rey, Tokyopop, Yen Press, Viz) is also included regardless of origin so long as it looks a bit like manga and didn’t merit exclusion. Many source books, art manuals, and other non-fiction works also are tracked, so long as they’re about manga and not anime, or fandom in general.

The list was built up by looking at online sales sites, so some out of print titles are included if even a handful of used copies are still being sold online — at the major sites: Amazon, B&N, Borders and the like; not e-bay — and a handful of out-of-print-and-really-unavailable books are included because people try to order them anyway and they show up on a list of manga bestsellers somewhere.

Not all books are listed; manga had to have been sold [by someone, to someone] before they make it into my source charts, and from there into the database.

• There’s a typo in line 5938. The way you list The Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya is just plain weird. Your dates for Vagabond are off. You list one series by my favourite manga-ka but you skipped the rest: Fix these, please.

Here’s the flipside to that over-generous CC license above: yes there are errors. Fix ‘em yourself. I don’t want to hear about.

But as partial apology/explanation… I list the Haruhi books that way because I am also tracking sales of series, not just individual volumes, so the backwards and occasionally repetitive line entries reflect that need (in fact, are structured to enable it). I know the dates on Vagabond are off, because some of the books were re-released as second editions while Viz also released new volumes simultaneously. Other series have the same problem, and no, I’m not going to fix it. Since I use the database to track online sales, I first came across many of the books in the 2nd edition (and so the error is 2-3 years old) and I’m primarily interested in whatever version is selling today. So, no double listing for first/second editions, no separate listings for hardcover & paperback editions of the same book, and no mention of re-prints or re-packaging of material if it is substantially the same book.

An exception is made for box sets, multi-volume collections, and “premium” editions (which are usually multi-volume sets anyway, or with substantial material added) – these get listed and tracked separately.

This is a free, shared file. Any errors are not My errors, they are now Our errors, and I hereby empower you, with your keen eyes and the blessing of OCD, to fix any and all errors and to henceforth be the proud keeper & curator of the One True Correct Manga Database. I don’t have the time.

• What next?

Well, past the title-adds and tweaks necessary for my rankings, I won’t be messing with this much. Compiling aggregate online sales rankings is quite enough to keep me busy. Since new books are released all the time, I’ll be adding most if not all of these (week-by-week) as they come up in the data collection for that process.

I won’t be slavishly following press releases and publishers web sites to find and add anything, though — just the books that come up as I track online sales.

In fact, this is likely a one-time exercise, a snapshot of where we are right now. My database will continue to grow in the ways I need it to, but this database as posted, your database, will fill in and grow in whatever ways you need it to. Someone could add author & artist to each entry, or ISBNs (with the multiple entries for 1st & 2nd ed., hardcover, etc) or a tag that flags some entries as manhwa, some as yaoi, some as OEL. That’s great, and more information makes the base more useful to more people.

But I’ve run my marathon; I’m handing off the baton.

##

The file is native to OpenOffice, so the .ods is the original. It is available served up multiple ways.

Files permanently archived at Archive.org

.ods spreadsheet
Microsoft Excel
html: data table
html: human readable
plain text: tab delimited
plain text: human readable

Also archived, in the Google spreadsheet format, at Google Docs



Two years in, and still trying to find my place.

filed under , 29 June 2010, 00:23 by

It’s odd to celebrate an ‘anniversary’ (and only 2 years?) when one has been blogging more-or-less-continuously for six and a half years on a variety of platforms, and the blogging experiment was only the latest, most public permutation of a writing life. As experiments go, I’d have to say: I still need more data, and possibly a control group, to know if blogging is a worthwhile activity.

incidentally: I’m reminded how much the noun/verb ‘blog’ used to bother me. Now, (with the appropriate concrete derivational suffix) I’d be happy to take it on as my job title.

However, the end of June (29 June, in fact) is the anniversary date of this particular domain’s debut, so: Happy Birthday, Rocket Bomber!

[Actually, the first post dates to 26 May 2008 and imported archives predate that by another 18 months, but who’s counting?]

I didn’t bother with this last year, because honestly, I didn’t think about it. However, I’ve recently paid good money—in advance—for two more years of web hosting, so the idea of a minor celebration and some major reflection hit me the right way.

I’ve tried a lot of things over the past two years (some of them hold-over features from previous blogs) but nothing really stuck as regular weekly columns. It seems likely that so long as I hold a full-time job, I’ll never be able to post on-time or regularly. And that’s fine: as the bookstore job is a ripe vineyard, and many a post has been squeezed from those grapes, and I feel the ‘rethinking the box’ experiment is a vintage that will age well and will only get better over time. Some other attempted ‘tags’ and features haven’t done so well, but a blog is hard to do as a solo act and the exercise only gets harder if you attempt to compete with link bloggers and daily news sites.

##

I’d like to present, for you edification and delectation, My Best Posts for the first 2 years on RocketBomber:

http://www.rocketbomber.com/2009/11/17/form-content-copies-rights-and-plato
http://www.rocketbomber.com/2009/01/10/5by8-29-the-blind-men-and-the-elephant-in-the-room
http://www.rocketbomber.com/2009/02/24/rethinking-the-box
http://www.rocketbomber.com/2009/06/04/rethinking-the-box-beating-the-big-box-five-case-studies
http://www.rocketbomber.com/2009/01/24/chart-estimated-market-share-2008

& of course, the Emma MMF

…and you might have your favourites but these five (minus the pie chart) are the ones I find myself referring back to and linking to most. [the pie chart, not so much, but that was a fun use of the database]

And My Eternal Shame — the three most popular posts:

http://www.rocketbomber.com/2009/06/01/rethinking-the-box-the-seven-types-of-customer
http://www.rocketbomber.com/2009/04/17/aside
http://www.rocketbomber.com/2009/04/09/rethinking-the-box-books-vs-comic-books

Looks like 2009 was a good year — and I have some more recent posts [4 to 10 June 2010 was a damn good week] that I also like quite a bit but it remains to be seen if they’re also as ‘classic’ as the ones above.

##

How to celebrate? well, I’m thinking of taking time off of work, and spending it porting over all the remaining reviews (and select columns) leftover from Comicsnob.com, so all my output is in one place.

I’d like to restart the weekly Manga Online Sales Rankings, using a brand new scoring system and with a couple of new sources.

I’d like to resume weekly manga reviews, and start reviewing more anime.

I’d like to actually make good on a longstanding threat and start the RocketBomber podcast netcast.

And I’m beginning to look at redesigning the site from scratch. Starting with some original art. Which means I have to teach myself how to draw.

so. busy week.



Manhwa Moveable Feast: The Color of Earth

filed under , 27 June 2010, 10:50 by

The Color of Earth by Kim Dong Hwa

Published by: First Second

320 (306) pages.
Original Language: Korean
Orientation: Left to Right
Vintage: 2003. US edition Mar. 2009.
Translation: Lauren Na
Adaptation, Lettering, and Design by uncredited staff.

No publisher’s age rating was given, but I’d put it at 13+ (for this first volume) assuming the kid knows where babies come from and can handle brief nudity in context.
isbn 9781596434585

##

Two more notes on the publication history of The Color of Earth: according to the publishing info at the front of the book, the original title (as credited in the copyright notice) is “The Story of Life on the Golden Fields, vol. 1”. Also, First Second negotiated English translation rights directly with the author — by itself, not that unusual for books, but I note it because of how it differs from most US manga publication.

##

The Color of Earth is a depiction of small village life in a pre-war Korea — likely pre-1910, though it’s hard to put an exact date on the book. If the author’s forward is to be believed (“little gems from my mother’s life at sixteen”) then this is Korea (or at least a small part of it) from just four and maybe three generations ago, which doesn’t quite jibe either. Modes of dress are traditional, though the use of patterned textiles by residents in a rural Korean village points to cheap, imported, machine produced cloth — so sometime after 1800, and probably before 1895. The existence of things like steam rail but the lack of war or politics points to a very narrow range: 1885-1895. One might also consider some later dates, but to go as far as 1910 without any mention of Japanese occupation or international politics—even in a rural village— would be remiss. [these historical details may be in later volumes, but a cursory glance through both didn’t reveal any]

Granted, this is far, far from a historical account. The Color of Earth is soaked in nostalgia, perhaps, for a simpler time and views village life through a widescreen, rose-colored Cinemascope lens:

The book is beautiful, in it’s depiction of nature

and other key detail, like the simple but obviously crafted buildings, or the aforementioned locomotive

obviously, Kim Dong Hwa knows his way around a piece of paper, and the care taken shows in the art.

As a story though…
well, I guess that’s why we review these things

##

Let me start out by saying: I thought farm kids grew up with animals and the like and so had a much better idea where babies come from, what males and females tend to do to procreate the species (whatever species) and probably also have a better idea of what the block-and-tackle look like and why guys have it while girls don’t. Granted, Ehwa when first introduced is only 7, so the childish games and curious questions are part of that learning process — and her mother runs an inn, it’s not like they farm — but still I thought the first few chapters of the book were gratuitous.

If we’re telling a romance story, we start with the romance (age 16? earlier?). If this is to be a slice of life tale, I’d expect a lot more of the day-to-day, a better development of friendships, kids being kids and the like. If we’re going to explore human sexuality, I’d like to see more couples, more points of view, even more characters who better represent the whole of human nature and needs and compromises, and not just this one-note homily of waiting-and-wanting.

Wuthering Heights or other Victorian-era romance did the chaste courtship-and-marriage bit and they did it better.

At best you can credit The Color of Earth for being honest about the sex, but at worst it comes off as very crude: The boy with his hands always down his pants; Ehwa’s “friend” Bongsoon who seems to revel in highlighting all the things she knows (and has done) that (chaste, pure) Ehwa hasn’t.

##

So, these kids need a sex education program, and they needed it 2 years ago.

##

The book could use something, anything, to do besides having characters sit around and talk about sex and relationships in flowery metaphor. …makes me wish for a giant robot or alien invasion to turn up just so this book would have a plot…

What about a bad harvest? Or a flood? Or a government official coming to collect the overdue taxes, or an honest love-triangle for any of these characters? Not that every book needs heaping helpings of drama — there is something to be said for quiet reflection, or a slice-of-life story that isn’t about anything in particular.

However, The Color of Earth isn’t a consideration of life or the small joys to be found there; even considered as ‘one girl’s coming of age story’ this is weak sauce. The heavy and heavy-handed insistence on sex makes the book a tad depressing. There is a whole world out there, and as a child I was curious about all of it, and yet whenever Ehwa is shown walking through the countryside — the beautiful countryside, as the art in this book is quite lovely — she is always staring down at her feet, and fretting over woman’s lot in life.

The author made a choice, both to begin the story when Ehwa was only seven, and then to show only those moments in her life that had to do with her education into the ways of men and women, and the moments when she herself seemed obsessed with them. We miss out on years of her life that are not shown, and on the rest of her world, and on the opportunity to see her as a real person, and not a caricature.

The most interesting person to me is Ehwa’s mom, in that she at least has a job, a business to run, a daughter to raise, and a life – She also has a lover, who seems to care for her even if he is a wanderer who only appears infrequently. She’s a complex, rounded character —

Or at least she would be if she weren’t in the story merely to explain things to her daughter, and to fret as her daughter grows into a woman. It would also help if she had a name: in the book, she’s just “Ehwa’s mom” when referred to by others.

##

The “Color Trilogy” (of which this is the first volume) is worth a bit of your time, to consider the craft that went into the art, and to gawk at the artwork itself. It’s also of note as manhwa that has received the full-on indy graphic novel treatment: First Second did a fine job packaging the books, 300+ page volumes in a larger trim size (6×8½ in.) with french flaps and uncut, deckle edge pages. These are fine, handsome volumes, and your library will look better for having them.

Even considering all my reservations about the story and characters, this is also a view into a culture that just doesn’t exist anymore. No matter how narrow the window provided, it’s still a glimpse into a time (though just a century ago) long past.

For other opinions and takes on the title, please visit the MMF Index Page for the Color Trilogy over at Manhwa Bookshelf. This is just about the last day of our week-long look into these books, so a final wrap-up is likely to post tomorrow at Melinda’s site

##

A free review copy was provided [second-hand] by the publisher, via the kind offices of a friendly librarian. [thanks, Eva!]



Found: Japanese Schoolgirl Confidential

filed under , 26 June 2010, 01:25 by

Found:

Japanese Schoolgirl Confidential: How Teenage Girls Made a Nation Cool

Paperback, 192 pages, Kodansha International, isbn 9784770031150

Releases August 1.

from the publisher:

From manga and anime to movies, magazines, video games, advertising and music, Japanese schoolgirls are everywhere. For years, schoolgirls have shown up in internationally popular anime such as Sailor Moon, The Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya, and Blood: The Last Vampire. Films such as Battle Royale inspired Quentin Tarantino to include a fighting schoolgirl in Kill Bill; and recently, Rinko Kikuchi received an Oscar nomination for her role as a schoolgirl in the film Babel. There are schoolgirl characters in video games such as Street Fighter. And the “Japanese Schoolgirl Watch” column in Wired magazine has long kept an eye on the trends emerging among these stylish teens. In effect, the Japanese schoolgirl has all but replaced the “geisha-girl” as Japan’s new female icon.

Brian Ashcraft, the author of Arcade Mania!, and his sidekick, Shoko Ueda, take the reader beneath the surface to discover the secrets of this iconic figure. By talking to Japanese women, including former and current J-pop idols, well-known actresses, models, writers, and artists — along with film directors, historians and marketers — the authors reveal the true story behind Japan’s obsession with schoolgirls and answer such burning questions as:
· Where did the sailor-style uniform come from?
· How did the Japanese schoolgirl develop into a brand that can be used to sell anything from kimchi to insurance?
· Why have Japanese schoolgirls become such a symbol of girl power?
· And, most importantly, why are they so very, very cool?

About the Authors

BRIAN ASHCRAFT is the author of Arcade Mania! published by Kodansha International, and is Contributing Editor to Wired magazine, where he regularly writes the “Japanese Schoolgirl Watch” column. He also contributes to Kotaku, one of the world’s most widely-read blogs, and has written for such publications as Metropolis, Popular Science, Ready Made and Otaku USA.

SHOKO UEDA has been the research assistant for the “Japanese Schoolgirl Watch” column, and draws on her own experiences as a former Japanese schoolgirl. This is her first book.

submitted without further commentary.

More: www.rocketbomber.com/category/found/



E-Books and Readers: Price War, Betamax, Snake Oil, Razor Blades, and Apple Pie

filed under , 21 June 2010, 22:24 by

Yeah, yeah, I know: most of the time I’m too clever for my own good.

Let me explain 4 of the 5 components of the article title before we get to specifics:

  • A Price War is “a term used in the economic sector to indicate a state of intense competitive rivalry accompanied by a multi-lateral series of price reduction”
  • Betamax is a video format “generally considered obsolete, though it is still used in specialist applications by a small minority of people.”
  • Snake Oil – “applied metaphorically to any product with exaggerated marketing but questionable or unverifiable quality or benefit.”
  • and the Razor Blade reference is actually to the Razor and Blades business model, “the concept of either giving away a salable item for nothing or charging an extremely low price to generate a continual market for another, generally disposable, item”

And I’ll make all this work, I promise.

##

Last point first:

Razor Blades.

Seth Godin [wiki, official site] is a big-idea-guy; he posts boggling (in the good sense of the verb ‘to boggle’) ideas almost daily to his blog. A couple of weeks ago (7 June) he posted an article titled Paperback Kindle directed at Amazon but of note for any potential market player. He posited 4 new business models for an ebook reader:

  • no frills, rock bottom price (Seth calls it at $49) – get people to buy into your ecosystem with a heavily discounted chunk of hardware, knowing they’ll be buying e-books from you for years. This is Amazon’s current business model, except they wanted to charge you $259 $189 for it.
  • Again, the razor and blades model, cited as such by Seth but pitched slightly differently: Buy, say, 8 e-books and get the reader for free. —actually, both the ‘paperback’ and ‘razor’ are fine examples of the freebie model, just different ways to sell it to customers. Alternately:
  • A subscription service, with subsidized hardware, just like a cell phone. Tie your customers into a contract but make it sound like a Book of the Month Club — sure, the e-reader is free, but you just opened yourself up to ‘push’ marketing, where the book each month (a fine book, I’m sure, but…) is not the selection of editorial staff but rather the winner of an auction, whomever was willing to pay most for access to your eyeballs.
  • …and lastly, something fairly Seth-specific that may be important to business, social networks, and New Media types [like, say, bloggers] but doesn’t quite jive with traditional publishers.

My extensive linking to and gloss upon the words of Godin is only meant to highlight one point: the money is not in the e-book appliances, but in the continuing and ongoing sales of e-books. $10 a pop for a file? iTunes was only charging 99¢…

Snake Oil

I’m not going to debate the $9.99 price point — except to note here that it’s about $5 too low for a brand new book about to be released in hardcover, considering the non-print production costs that get discounted or ignored by most ‘experts’ who look at publishing as a dinosaur and e-books as the only answer.

— And e-books themselves are not the ‘snake oil’ that I feel salesmen are trying to foist on an ignorant public. Books are books, e- or otherwise, and they are the most important thing to me, in both my life and career (I’m a bookseller) and everything that I am and aspire to be was either found in or is founded upon books. I love the damn things.

That said: I recently looked into the ePub format and lo and behold: e-books are digital files.

Yeah, I wasn’t really shocked either.

Here’s the thing: ePub formatted e-books use XML, XHTML, a subset of CSS and honestly, No One needs a new chunk of hardware to read these things. Adobe could add ePub functionality to it’s PDF Reader tomorrow, and a creative coder could have extensions for Chrome or Firefox up by the end of the week.

ePub e-books are merely formatted text, a damn sight less complicated than, say, PHP scripted web-pages served up, dynamically, from a MySQL database. —that is to say, e-books are less complicated by many degrees from My Blog, This Very Web Page You Are Reading Right Now on Whatever Phone, Netbook, Tablet, Laptop, or Desktop Computer Screen. Rocket Bomber — indeed, any blog — is magnitudes more complex than an e-book. [so far, no one has complained about blog browser compatibility]

E-Books are [barely] formatted text, and the web has been reliably serving text since 1993. E-Books are easy.

So, the Snake Oil: Amazon (and it’s copy-cats) are trying to convince us we need a new appliance to read text. “Brand new thing, this, the book, never mind the Gutenberg behind the curtain or that sticky-cable thing — if you want to read books, well, step right up! I’ve got what you need [*slap*] right here!

There’s nothing wrong with a book, or plain .txt files, or HTML, or browsable web pages.

So, um, why pray tell do I need another screen to read your ‘e-books’ when it would have been just as easy to read them without proprietary controls and locked-in business relationships? Hm?

Amazon (and its copy-cats) want you to buy their e-book appliance because then [presumably] it ties you in to their system and you end up buying just their flavour of e-books for life. This is the double-damnation of the Kindle — as yes, in fact, if you buy an e-book from Amazon you’re doomed to Amazon-sanctioned readers for life — but other vendors are just as culpable — as everyone selling ebooks may pay lip service to open standards and “you buy it, you own it” rhetoric but the truth is: I, you, and everyone else are just one hard-drive-crash away from having to re-buy everything: music, books, computer games & applications included.

Right now, in the realm of e-books and e-book appliances, there is both a format war ongoing and a price war on the horizon.

Both make little sense. (You might have already guessed why I think so, but I’ll cover the other points first before my conclusions)

##

Betamax

At one point in time, Betamax and VHS were competing formats. [both are obsolete now; one more object lesson in the e-book technology discussion]

Betamax is more notable in the modern day-and-age for the lengths Sony was willing to go to support the new technology [see: Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.] and that’s a debt we all owe Sony and for which I myself will be eternally grateful, as the SCOTUS ruling on the Betamax case re-affirmed & established a whole new class of fair use and the internet you all so enjoy today may or may not be dependent on it, but your TiVos and Netflix most certainly are.

Anyway. In this article, Betamax (no matter it’s virtues) is cited as a cautionary tale: it was a proprietary format which never garnered enough users to persist after it’s corporate sponsor abandoned it.

I’ll let you Kindle owners puzzle that last bit out.

Are there cases where the ‘proprietary’ format won out over the market and became the standard? Why yes, I think there may be — but only after patents expired and ‘proprietary’ became open domain.

It’s a long process and between Sonny Bono and the speed at which technology advances in the present day, there is a large disconnect — not just between ‘rights’ and ‘the public domain’ but a cognitive disconnect where ‘rights’ are now assumed to continue into perpetuity. There is no innovation, no standing on the shoulders of giants — only a klatch of greedy gollums hoarding their ‘Precious’ forever, no matter how it might damage us, or them.

The open [I’m tempted to put that in quotes but the format is Open even if it falls short of full implementation of that ideal] ePub format helps… but only if the motives of market players follows up on the promise of Open Formats —

That is to say: Books are open formats; just open a book. All this e-book nonsense hasn’t proven itself — and one can argue e- is better (and in many ways, it is) but unless and until we figure out this rights-and-perpetuity-thing I quite honestly hate e-books.

My fear is that once the opportunity to make money on an e-book expires, so does the e-book. No permanent record, no addition to the corpus of human knowledge, no appeal and no recourse: Once the economic viability of a book is gone, there is no [apparent] need [to a business-type] to support the e-book and make sure it persists.

I shudder. Business models suck and they’ll suck us all down with them.

Open Source was the best idea of the last century, as important as the Scientific Method was in the 18th and 19th centuries — and if we can be sure Open Source interfaces with what used to be the Public Domain, I for one will be a lot more confident about our future as a species and our ability to solve all our current and any future problems.

This may make me some sort of hybrid Scientist/Socialist/Communist/Pirate, where I feel ideas must be shared. If so, I welcome that label. And I will stoutly defend my new niche against those who would use the same arguments to obtain popular entertainment iterations for free. Dude: free exchange of ideas is one thing, making sure the wealth of human knowledge is available to future generations — that’s great; admirable, even — but my intellectual argument does not guarantee you access to the latest chapters of Naruto or the most recent episode of the Bleach anime.

That’s merely entertainment.

I’m arguing books. Ideas. Social models and actionable suggestions for transforming our society.

Confuse the two at your peril. At best, you are uninformed and intentionally ignorant; at worst you are part of the problem and only provide fodder to those who seek to clamp down on ideas and innovation because there is no profit in it, and to whom the very idea of a ‘free’ society is just another legal fiction that can be ‘fixed’ if enough lobbying dollars are funnelled into respective legislative bodies world-wide.

##

If necessary I’ll expand on that argument but I’m already off-topic.

##

Price War

The first news article I saw [cnet] was time-stamped 6AM: from B&N $149, Wi-Fi-Only Addition to NOOK Family… NOOK 3G Available at $199

So: Nook as we knew it now $60 cheaper, new model [not yet in stores, but announced] for $110 cheaper than the previous established ‘standard’ e-reader price.

New Chapter.

Didn’t take long: by the time I sat down to lunch, Amazon had their PR up: AMAZON KINDLE NOW ONLY $189 [emphasis Amazon’s]

Yeah, now we really are seeing a competitive e-reader market, and given the realities of the Razor and Blades model: prices will go lower. The point of this mess is not to sell e-reader appliances, but to gain market share.

The retailer with the largest base gets to dictate terms to not only the customers, but to the publishers.

[And I haven’t even mentioned Apple yet. This is going to get real messy before Christmas.]

Speaking of Apple, Joe Wikert posts a dissenting view, on why bookstores (meaning B&N and Borders) should abandon e-reader gadgets right now, in favour of the iPad, as posted here

key quote:

“Seriously, have you seen the ‘Nook specialist’ at the front of B&N stores?  This poor employee has the unfortunate job of pulling you over to the Nook display with the hopes of wowing you with the device’s many features.  It feels like the teenager serving orange chicken samples on toothpicks in the mall food court, only more awkward.  Imagine the buzz the store would generate if that employee was showing demos of the iPad, featuring the store’s app and books.  I guarantee you it would drive a lot more interest than the Nook display (or the almost completely abandoned new media section at my local Borders store, where they try to sell Sony Readers).”

My current employment as a B&N manager restricts me from commenting further [though you might infer something from the fact that I posted that quote to begin with].

##

Apple Pie

There’s no law that says you can’t take advantage of your customers.
There’s no law that says you can’t traffic on ignorance.
There’s no law that says you have to be altruistic.
There’s no law that says you have to care about, or even serve the needs of, your established customer base.

In fact, there is an established, centuries-old tradition of deceiving your customers, hobbling potential competition, perpetuating unfair systems that happen to be unfair in your favour, lying, cheating, stealing, and generally being a total dick

in fact, being a total dick [in a business sense, and perhaps elsewise] is as American as Apple Pie.

So I can scold Amazon for it’s dick-moves, but my own employer is just as guilty and I’d like to point out one last time:

e-books are just files — many different ways to open files; & you didn’t need to buy a $500 $259 $199 $149 $49 new device at any price to read text. The web is free, and a hell of a lot more complex that these new “e-books”.

I’m conflicted, and confused. I really want to rant and rave against ebooks [and have, over multiple posts] but I’m also trying to understand where my reader base is going – & is this e-book-thing a format they’re adopting, or just a distraction and annoyance?



Two Nook Notes [updated]

filed under , 21 June 2010, 09:56 by

I’d like to remind everyone that my day job, my paycheck, is Barnes & Noble.

[if you think that makes a difference, I’d invite you to read some of my columns]

Anyway, two points I’d like to bring to everyone’s attention:

First: Listed over at Nikkei.com, Headline: Tezuka Manga Available Soon On Nook E-Reader — and the only bit I can read (since I’m not shelling out $90 for access to Nikkei for the full article) “Manga by the late Osamu Tezuka, the creator of Astro Boy, will be available on Barnes & Noble Inc.‘s Nook electronic book reader.”

I think it’s an odd announcement: not that the manga is going e- (a development we all expected, and something that will have to stand on its own merits depending on the print-to-e conversion) but that they call-out Nook as the platform.

update 9:00PM 21 June:
Someone was kind enough to email me the following, which was a nice confirmation of information available to me as a B&N employee:

“Manga by the late Osamu Tezuka—best known as the creator of Astro Boy—will be available on Barnes & Noble, Inc.‘s NOOK electronic book reader as early as this autumn. Teaming up with New York-based publisher AmericanDream Publishing Inc., Tezuka Production Co. is expected to release English translations of Tezuka’s major works, including Phoenix and Black Jack. Three or four stories [sic], totaling about 100 pages, will likely sell for around one dollar each”

So, I think by ‘stories’ we can clearly see that they mean individual chapters (given the page count) and we’ll chalk that up to a translation error.

As we all know [see Kodansha] an article on Nikkei is great — as close to the source as we can get, in many cases — but plans and results are two different things. I have full confidence in TezukaCo. but have to wonder about this AmericanDreams Publishing — who are they? Nothing came up on a Google or wiki search (yes, I’m a lazy blogger) so I’m guessing they’re a start-up?

And as previously noted, it’s odd this comes out as nook news, as the nook uses the ePub format and this could have been just as easily pitched as an iPad announcement and as such would have set the manga-blogosphere on fire. Color me skeptical, and unimpressed, but secretly hopeful: [Phoenix on an e-reader?! Aw heck yeah!]

[original post continues]

Second Nook Note:

Via cnetB&N adds $149 WiFi-only Nook, cuts Nook 3G to $199

As the cnet article notes: ball is now in Amazon’s court.

And now, I need to stop blogging from the break room, go clock in, and actually get to work. boo. :(



Caption this photo:

filed under , 17 June 2010, 16:48 by

“Sorry kids; I haven’t been here in a while… back in my day this place was all porn theatres, strip clubs, and hookers as far as the eye could see.”

Note: not really a caption contest. I just wanted to post that.

I was very skeptical about a smurfs movie, and even moreso when I heard it was a live-action/CGI mix. BUT:

Neil Patrick Harris and Hank Azaria are two of the live-action actors; Jonathan Winters, Alan Cumming, George Lopez, Fred Armisen, John Oliver, Paul Reubens, & Wolfgang puckin’ Puck, among others, are voicing various smurfs.

Still don’t know if I’m going to see it, but damn, they have my interest now.



← previous posts          newer posts →


Yes, all the links are broken.

On June 1, 2015 (after 6 years and 11 months) I needed to relaunch/restart this blog, or at least rekindle my interest in maintaining and updating it.

Rather than delete and discard the whole thing, I instead moved the blog -- database, cms, files, archives, and all -- to this subdomain. When you encounter broken links (and you will encounter broken links) just change the URL in the address bar from www.rocketbomber.com to archive.rocketbomber.com.

I know this is inconvenient, and for that I apologise. In addition to breaking tens of thousands of links, this also adversely affects the blog visibility on search engines -- but that, I'm willing to live with. Between the Wayback Machine at Archive.org and my own half-hearted preservation efforts (which you are currently reading) I feel nothing has been lost, though you may have to dig a bit harder for it.

As always, thank you for reading. Writing version 1.0 of Rocket Bomber was a blast. For those that would like to follow me on the 2.0 - I'll see you back on the main site.

menu

home

Bookselling Resources

about the site
about the charts
contact

Manga Moveable Feasts!
Thanksgiving 2012
Emma, March 2010
MMF [incomplete] Archives


subscribe

RSS Feed Twitter Feed

categories

anime
bookselling
business
comics
commentary
field reports
found
general fandom
learning Japanese
linking to other people's stuff
Links and Thoughts
manga
Manga Moveable Feast
metablogging
music documentaries
publishing
rankings
rankings analysis
recipes
recommendations
retail
reviews
rewind
site news
snark
urban studies


-- not that anyone is paying me to place ads, but in lieu of paid advertising, here are some recommended links.--

support our friends


Top banner artwork by Lissa Pattillo. http://lissapattillo.com/

note: this comic is not about beer

note: this comic is not about Elvis

In my head, I sound like Yahtzee (quite a feat, given my inherited U.S.-flat-midwestern-accent.)

where I start my browsing day...

...and one source I trust for reviews, reports, and opinion on manga specifically. [disclaimer: I'm a contributor there]

attribution




RocketBomber is a publication of Matt Blind, some rights reserved: unless otherwise noted in the post, all articles are non-commercial CC licensed (please link back, and also allow others to use the same data where applicable).