Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /home1/rocketb1/public_html/archive/textpattern/lib/constants.php on line 136
Rocket Bomber - article - retail - business - Nook speculation at this early stage is dangerous - and likely useless

Rocket Bomber - article - retail - business - Nook speculation at this early stage is dangerous - and likely useless


Nook speculation at this early stage is dangerous, and likely useless

filed under , 7 January 2012, 12:53 by

Full Disclosure: Barnes & Noble signs my paychecks, and I own trivial amounts of BKS through a company sponsored 401(k). But I am field management, in stores, and so not privy to corporate secrets past what both you and I can both read in press releases.

So, B&N: in Thursday’s press release they said

“In order to capitalize on the rapid growth of the NOOK digital business, and its favorable leadership position in the expanding market for digital content, the Company has decided to pursue strategic exploratory work to separate the NOOK business.”

and two ‘graphs later

“There can be no assurance that the review of a potential separation of the NOOK digital business will result in a separation. There is no timetable for the review, and the Company does not intend to comment further regarding the review, unless and until a decision is made.”

##

of course others have commented; a small sample:

http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57354321-93/barnes-noble-ceo-were-committed-to-the-nook/
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/01/06/with-nook-plan-barnes-noble-sets-out-possible-shake-up/
http://seekingalpha.com/article/317961-why-barnes-noble-needs-to-keep-the-nook?source=yahoo

##

I think the main thing that prompted the announcement was 1st: full legal disclosure. They are legitimately looking into this, & I’m sure there is an SEC rule that requires them to say so.

But, a decision to “separate” the Nook business could include operating the digital division as a wholly owned subsidiary, spinning off the business [issuing stock in a new Nook company to all current B&N shareholders], selling it outright, or something less revolutionary, like doing some basic math/accounting to list nook as a separate line item in B&N annual reports.

Or nothing. Nothing is an option.

I think the main thing that B&N wanted to accomplish with this announcement was proper consideration. Some props for what they’ve done in 2 short years – A wholescale reevaluation by both pundits and investors in the business. It could be a thinly veiled message direct to Liberty Media, asking them to invest another half billion to buy the whole company outright (or to buy the nook business, unbundled)

At any rate, much like the announcement made that B&N was considering “strategic alternatives” up to and including a sale, which made the news last year.

If you were to ask my opinion, I must demure: that would be too much like investment advice. But I’m not quitting my job as a bookstore manager, or cashing out my 401(k).



Comment

  1. All I know is that if B&N reached a deal with getjar for a B&N store getjar app, $4.99, and the app is set to a window of apps where instead of B&N’s curated B&N store, its just a quick thumbs up, thumbs down for each app in the store that getjar puts forward for delivering through the getjar app …

    … they’d have so much win they could shower in it. Almost everything people want to root the damn things for. Thumbs down on an Amazon store or Amazon kindle, but thumbs up to Aldiko and the Overdrive app, thumbs up to Crunchyroll, thumbs up to Crackle if they get it to work again. Thumbs down on apps already in the B&N store, but thumbs up on tons of free games.

    The support headaches that make a big “open” app store so scary? “Did you get the app from us or from getjar? We can help with any app you downloaded directly from the B&N store. Apps you downloaded from another seller like getjar are supported by getjar.”

    Getjar would be buckets of free stuff and, ironically, you can get people to pay to get access to buckets of free stuff!

    Comment by BruceMcF — 17 February 2012, 01:26 #

Commenting is closed for this article.



Yes, all the links are broken.

On June 1, 2015 (after 6 years and 11 months) I needed to relaunch/restart this blog, or at least rekindle my interest in maintaining and updating it.

Rather than delete and discard the whole thing, I instead moved the blog -- database, cms, files, archives, and all -- to this subdomain. When you encounter broken links (and you will encounter broken links) just change the URL in the address bar from www.rocketbomber.com to archive.rocketbomber.com.

I know this is inconvenient, and for that I apologise. In addition to breaking tens of thousands of links, this also adversely affects the blog visibility on search engines -- but that, I'm willing to live with. Between the Wayback Machine at Archive.org and my own half-hearted preservation efforts (which you are currently reading) I feel nothing has been lost, though you may have to dig a bit harder for it.

As always, thank you for reading. Writing version 1.0 of Rocket Bomber was a blast. For those that would like to follow me on the 2.0 - I'll see you back on the main site.

menu

home

Bookselling Resources

about the site
about the charts
contact

Manga Moveable Feasts!
Thanksgiving 2012
Emma, March 2010
MMF [incomplete] Archives


subscribe

RSS Feed Twitter Feed

categories

anime
bookselling
business
comics
commentary
field reports
found
general fandom
learning Japanese
linking to other people's stuff
Links and Thoughts
manga
Manga Moveable Feast
metablogging
music documentaries
publishing
rankings
rankings analysis
recipes
recommendations
retail
reviews
rewind
site news
snark
urban studies


-- not that anyone is paying me to place ads, but in lieu of paid advertising, here are some recommended links.--

support our friends


Top banner artwork by Lissa Pattillo. http://lissapattillo.com/

note: this comic is not about beer

note: this comic is not about Elvis

In my head, I sound like Yahtzee (quite a feat, given my inherited U.S.-flat-midwestern-accent.)

where I start my browsing day...

...and one source I trust for reviews, reports, and opinion on manga specifically. [disclaimer: I'm a contributor there]

attribution




RocketBomber is a publication of Matt Blind, some rights reserved: unless otherwise noted in the post, all articles are non-commercial CC licensed (please link back, and also allow others to use the same data where applicable).